By Kevin Ware
2013/06/19
Tennis News and Information, Tournament Coverage and Features
By Kevin Ware
By Kevin Ware
(March 29, 2013) Serena Williams has already broken Steffi Graf’s total number of Miami match wins, and now has the chance to pull ahead in most Miami titles won. The only thing between Williams and Miami immortality is Maria Sharapova. Sharapova, the newest member of the career Grand Slam club, has been to the Miami final on four separate occasions, but never taken the title. Unfortunately for Sharapova, number five won’t be any different.
Writing about this match feels like Groundhog Day, because I know I’ve written these same words before each of their last few matches. This is the worst match-up possible for Sharapova. After two wins over Williams in 2004 (Wimbledon and WTA Championships), she has yet to win another. In fact, this rivalry has been so one-sided that it often seems like Maria is doomed to never even win another set.
Saturday probably won’t be any different, but you never know. Every day is a new day, and any player can be beat on a given day (no matter how improbable). Let’s take a deeper look at this match and see if there is some way that Maria can reverse the losing trend against Serena.
Serena Williams [1] versus Maria Sharapova [2]
Head-to-Head: Serena leads 11-2
Sharapova was in dominant form against a slowed Jelena Jankovic. Williams was in ruthless form against Agniezska Radwanska. This is a no-brainer, since ruthless always wins over dominant. In a word, Maria has very little chance of beating Serena on Saturday. There are, however, a few things she can try that might delay the inevitable.
To have a chance in this final, Sharapova must:
Even with these helpful tips, all Serena needs to do is bring her “A” game, and she’ll get her 6th Miami title. If she only brings her “B” game, she’ll still get her 6th Miami title. It’ll just take 3 sets instead of 2.
Serena Williams in two sets.
Kevin Ware is in Miami covering the Sony Open as media for Tennis Panorama News. Follow his live updates on twitter @TennisNewsTPN. Follow his personal twitter @SFTennisFreak.
SONY OPEN TENNIS
Miami, FL, USA
March 19-31, 2013
Hard/Outdoors
Results – Friday, March 29, 2013
WTA Doubles – Semifinals
(WC) Raymond/Robson (USA/GBR) d. (1) Errani/Vinci (ITA/ITA) 61 62
(3) Petrova/Srebotnik (RUS/SLO) d. (WC) Kuznetsova/Pennetta (RUS/ITA) 63 36 106 (Match TB)
ATP Singles – Semifinals
[2] A Murray (GBR) d [8] R Gasquet (FRA) 67(3) 61 62
[3] D Ferrer (ESP) d [15] T Haas (GER) 46 62 63
ATP Doubles – Semi-finals
[8] M Fyrstenberg (POL) / M Matkowski (POL) d G Dimitrov (BUL) / F Nielsen (DEN) 64 62
SCHEDULE – SATURDAY, 30 MARCH, 2013
STADIUM start 12:00 pm
[1] S Williams (USA) vs [3] M Sharapova (RUS) – WTA – Singles Final
[8] M Fyrstenberg (POL) / M Matkowski (POL) vs [5] A Qureshi (PAK) / J Rojer (NED) – ATP – Doubles Final
By Kevin Ware
(March 29, 2013) MIAMI – If you’d asked anyone two weeks ago if these four players would be the Miami semifinalists, the answer would have been resoundingly “No”. Yet here we are, preparing for a battle of veterans in one semifinal while Murray faces a resurgent Frenchman in the other.
The 34 year-old Haas has a chance to make history. Ferrer has a legitimate shot at a second Masters Series title in the absence of his usual rivals. Gasquet has a chance to win his biggest title to date. And Andy has a chance to get a toehold into the season before heading to the clay. Lots of storylines, but only two go through. Here are my thoughts on why it will be a Haas versus Murray final.
Tommy Haas versus David Ferrer
Head-to-Head: Ferrer leads 2-0
Ferrer leads their head-to-head, but I wouldn’t put much stock in that statistic given that their last meeting was in 2008 in Dubai. They’re both very different players now, so I’ll focus on what both bring to the table for this particular semifinal match.
Ferrer has dropped one set in three matches (he received a walkover from Dmitry Tursunov). He’s playing solid tennis, but definitely not his best tennis. And he’s showing an edginess in his matches that isn’t particularly helpful to his cause. Tommy, on the other hand, is playing tremendous tennis. Both his forehand and backhand are causing damage. He’s serving well, moving brilliantly, and displaying a variety of shots that almost rivals the great Federer.
The keys to this match for Haas are his movement, his variety, and his forehand. If he moves well, uses his variety to keep Ferrer off-balance, and hits his forehand as strongly as he has in previous matches, Ferrer is in trouble. The key to the match for Ferrer is in his head. He needs to keep himself from going on edgy walkabouts like he has in previous matches. When his mood turns sour, his game goes sour and he starts to miss. If that happens against Haas, the German will take full advantage.
I’m giving the nod to Haas in three. He’s focused and sharp, yet also happy, relaxed, and enjoying every minute of his current run. He’s playing brilliantly and will continue to do so for a spot in the finals on Sunday.
Tommy Haas in three sets
Andy Murray versus Richard Gasquet
Head-to-Head: Andy leads 4-3
Andy leads their head-to-head, but once again this stat is misleading. They’ve only played two hard court matches, and that hasn’t happened since 2007. So there really isn’t much to go on in terms of recent hard court history.
A visit to the ATP site for their 52-week FedEx Index stats gives a slightly better picture of what we can expect. Murray outperforms Gasquet slightly in terms of hard court matches won, tiebreaks won, and a better performance over Top Ten players (not counting Gasquet’s win Thursday over Tomas Berdych).
In terms of their play in Miami, it’s a toss-up. Murray hasn’t played the type of spectacular tennis that won him the US Open title, but has won with ease over most of his opponents. Gasquet has played solid and “non-mental” tennis, but has had much tighter matches. Is that enough to beat Andy? Probably not. His win over Berdych was as much a function of Berdych’s game breaking down as it was Gasquet’s play.
Murray’s match against Marin Cilic wasn’t his best, but it was good enough. That’s what he does best, and without breaking down a la Berdych. If Gasquet plays Andy like he did Tomas, it will be a good match: but he will still lose in three.
Andy Murray in three sets.
Kevin Ware is in Miami covering the Sony Open as media for Tennis Panorama News. Follow his live updates on twitter @TennisNewsTPN. Follow his personal twitter @SFTennisFreak.
By Kevin Ware
(March 28, 2013) MIAMI – Maria Sharapova rolled past Jelena Jankovic 6-2, 6-1 in their women’s semifinal at the Sony Open. She did so with the help of an unfortunate case of scheduling; at least it was unfortunate for Jankovic, the late-night victor in a 3-set battle over Roberta Vinci. After press and other post-match activities, she had minimal rest before early morning semifinal match preparations.
Sharapova played and executed a nearly flawless match against Jankovic, so it’s not like she needed any help. Watching the match, however, it was obvious that Jankovic’s movement was hampered and her energy compromised. She acknowledged both Sharapova’s level of play and her own physical distress in her post-match press comments.
“I felt heavy on the court. I felt really tired and exhausted. I didn’t really have enough time to recover.” She quickly added, “But all the credit to Maria. She played very well, and she was the better one today.”
When asked if she’d made an attempt to adjust the match schedule, Jankovic replied,” I didn’t ask for a change, but I didn’t understand why… we were playing last night really late, and then we were first on today.”
Jankovic had every right to question the wisdom of scheduling the early match on stadium court with players who had the least amount of recovery time, while giving Williams and Radwanska nearly 48 hours between their quarterfinal and semifinal matches. Yet even with an additional 5 or 6 hours, the results might have been the same given the Maria’s excellent level of play.
In her error-filled match against Sara Errani, Maria hit 57 unforced errors. Her performance against Jankovic was better managed, with 17 winners against only 13 unforced errors. Not stellar numbers, but solid enough against an opponent who hit only 9 winners against 19 unforced errors.
You have to admire the steely ruthlessness of “Maria the competitor”, whose only concern on court is “the win”. When asked whether she came out strongly in order to take advantage of Jankovic’s late finish fatigue, Sharapova said, “Unfortunately I’m selfishly not really thinking about that when I’m out on the court, because it is my job to try to win the match as well as I can”.
In her post-match remarks the day before regarding her difficulties against Errani, Sharapova mentioned Errani’s spin. “I don’t think her ball is very powerful, but I think her spin is very dangerous when she has a lot of time.” Sharapova looked much more comfortable with Jankovic’s flatter ball striking. There’s also the benefit of familiarity when facing a known quantity.
“I haven’t played Jelena in almost two years. But, yes, we have played many times before that, including the juniors, so we know each other’s game very well. There’s not many secrets out there to what we do well and how we play.”
I don’t question the scheduling Serena Williams for the night match. She is, after all, a proven marquee match player. When you add the losses of Novak Djokovic, Juan Martin Del Potro et al to the withdrawals in this tournament of so many other top players, there’s little doubt that organizers were more inclined to schedule Williams in the evening for maximum exposure/ticket sales.
Sharapova also can’t be faulted for her ruthless competitive spirit, and excellent level of play. For Jankovic, however, the scheduling snafu was unfortunate. She never had a fighting chance, and the spectators were short-changed on a match that possibly could have lived up to the potential of their last clash in the 2011 Western and Southern Open final (Sharapova won 4-6 7-6 (3) 6-3). Maybe next time.
Kevin Ware is in Miami covering the Sony Open as media for Tennis Panorama News. Follow his live updates on twitter @TennisNewsTPN. Follow his personal twitter @SFTennisFreak.
Miami, FL, USA
March 19-31, 2013
Hard/Outdoors
Results – Thursday, March 28, 2013
WTA Singles – Semifinals
(1) Serena Williams (USA) d. (4) Agnieszka Radwanska (POL) 60 63
(3) Maria Sharapova (RUS) d. (22) Jelena Jankovic (SRB) 62 61
ATP Singles – Quarterfinals
[2] A Murray (GBR) d [9] M Cilic (CRO) 64 63
[8] R Gasquet (FRA) d [4] T Berdych (CZE) 63 63
ATP Doubles – Semifinals
[5] A Qureshi (PAK) / J Rojer (NED) d [2] M Granollers (ESP) / M Lopez (ESP) 63 62
ATP Doubles – Quarterfinals
G Dimitrov (BUL) / F Nielsen (DEN) d T Haas (GER) / X Malisse (BEL) 64 26 10-7
SCHEDULE – FRIDAY, 29 MARCH, 2013
STADIUM start 12:45 pm
[1] S Errani (ITA) / R Vinci (ITA) vs [WC] L Raymond (USA) / L Robson (GBR) – WTA
Not Before 3:00 PM
[15] T Haas (GER) vs [3] D Ferrer (ESP) – ATP
Not Before 7:00 PM
[8] R Gasquet (FRA) vs [2] A Murray (GBR) – ATP
[3] N Petrova (RUS) / K Srebotnik (SLO) vs [WC] S Kuznetsova (RUS) / F Pennetta (ITA) – WTA
COURT 1 start 4:00 PM
Not Before 4:00 PM
G Dimitrov (BUL) / F Nielsen (DEN) vs [8] M Fyrstenberg (POL) / M Matkowski (POL) – ATP
By Amy Fetherolf
(March 28, 2013) MIAMI — World No. 3 Andy Murray survived a tough challenge from World No. 11 Marin Cilic, beating him 6-4, 6-3 to advance to the semifinals at the Sony Open.
The first set featured five breaks of serve, four of which were traded early in the set. At 4-all, Cilic was broken again after double faulting twice. Murray successfully served the set out.
Cilic was immediately broken to start the second set. He had several chances at 1-2 to break back in a Murray service game that lasted more than 15 minutes. But Murray fended off the challenge, holding for 3-1. He secured an insurance break for 5-2, which came in handy as he was broken the first time he attempted to serve out the match, despite holding one match point.
He wouldn’t need to attempt to serve it out a second time. Cilic saved another five match points at 3-5, but Murray was able to break for the match, converting on his seventh match point.
“It was a tough, tough match,” Murray said. “Second set especially was a lot of long, long games, tough points. Obviously took a while to get to the finish line, but I thought I played a solid match, not too many errors and was tough in the important moments.”
“I think with each match I start to play a little bit better, feel a little bit more comfortable with the conditions. Sort of been able to control the ball better, so using some slice and higher balls, and variation work went well today.”
Murray will face Tomas Berdych or Richard Gasquet in the semifinals.
Amy Fetherolf is covering the Sony Open as media for Tennis Panorama News (@TennisNewsTPN). She is a co-founder of The Changeover. Follow her on Twitter at @AmyFetherolf.
SONY OPEN TENNIS
Miami, FL, USA
March 19-31, 2013
Hard/Outdoors
Results – Wednesday, March 27, 2013
WTA Singles – Quarterfinals
(3) Maria Sharapova (RUS) d. (8) Sara Errani (ITA) 75 75
(22) Jelena Jankovic (SRB) d. (15) Roberta Vinci (ITA) 64 67(6) 63
WTA Doubles – Quarterfinals
(3) Petrova/Srebotnik (RUS/SLO) d. (8) Goerges/Shvedova (GER/KAZ) 64 76(3)
(WC) Kuznetsova/Pennetta (RUS/ITA) d. (5) Huber/Martínez Sánchez (USA/ESP) w/o (Martínez Sánchez: left knee injury)
ATP Singles – Quarterfinals
[3] D Ferrer (ESP) d J Melzer (AUT) 46 63 60
[15] T Haas (GER) d [11] G Simon (FRA) 63 61
Doubles – Quarterfinals
[2] M Granollers (ESP) / M Lopez (ESP) d M Cilic (CRO) / L Dlouhy (CZE) 61 75
[5] A Qureshi (PAK) / J Rojer (NED) d N Almagro (ESP) / O Marach (AUT) 76(5) 64
SCHEDULE – THURSDAY, 28 MARCH, 2013
STADIUM start 1:00 pm
[3] M Sharapova (RUS) vs [22] J Jankovic (SRB) – WTA
Not Before 3:00 PM
[9] M Cilic (CRO) vs [2] A Murray (GBR) – ATP
Starting at 7:00 PM
[8] R Gasquet (FRA) vs [4] T Berdych (CZE) – ATP
Not Before 9:00 PM
[1] S Williams (USA) vs [4] A Radwanska (POL) – WTA
COURT 1 start 2:00 pm
[5] A Qureshi (PAK) / J Rojer (NED) vs [2] M Granollers (ESP) / M Lopez (ESP) – ATP
Not Before 4:00 PM
T Haas (GER) / X Malisse (BEL) vs G Dimitrov (BUL) / F Nielsen (DEN) – ATP
By Kevin Ware
(March 28, 2013) MIAMI – In spite of injuries, illness, upsets, and withdrawals by the dozens, my initial selections for the Women’s semifinals held (mostly) true to form with three out of four correct picks: Maria Sharapova, Serena Williams, and Agnieszka Radwanska. Jelena Jankovic occupies the fourth spot left open from Victoria Azarenka’s withdrawal.
Sharapova and Williams have had moments of brilliant play, and also moments of patchiness. Radwanska has struggled, needing three sets to advance each of her matches. Jankovic had only dropped one set, but also hasn’t been tested against any of the Top Ten.
Does any of this change my mind about a Serena-Maria final? No. Let’s take a look at my breakdown of the semifinal match-ups that leads me to that foregone final conclusion.
Maria Sharapova versus Jelena Jankovic
Head-to-Head: Sharapova leads 6-1
Their last meeting was a tightly-contested three-setter in the finals of the 2011 Western and Southern Open, which Sharapova won 4-6, 7-6(3), 6-3. The circumstances are slightly different this time around. Maria’s a much more confident player after completing her career Grand Slam. Though she may have bad patches of play, she’s usually able to maintain belief and fight through for the win as long as it’s not Serena Williams or Victoria Azarenka on the other side of the net.
Jankovic is playing solid tennis, but seems to be in perpetual “comeback” mode. That was true back in Cincinnati, and is true now in Miami. She’s hitting the ball with more confidence, and is moving well. Confidence is the key to Jankovic’s game. Without it, she struggles on every shot with the exception of her “down the line” backhand. With it, she can maintain with her forehand, serve, and defense. Sometimes, that’s enough for the win.
None of that will matter against Maria, however. This is one of those instances where the match-up against Jankovic suits Sharapova’s game and hitting style. Even with her struggles against Errani’s defense and spins in the quarterfinals, Sharapova will look across the net to Jankovic and see a comfortable foe.
I chatted with Jankovic’s hitting partner on the way back to the hotel. He didn’t divulge any particular strategies for the match, but rightly conceded that their games are a known quantity to one another. No surprises here.
Look for Sharapova to rediscover her form against regain her form against Jankovic for the victory.
Maria Sharapova in three sets
Serena Williams versus Agnieszka Radwanska
Hedad-to-Head: Serena Williams leads 4-0
Radwanska has won only one set against Serena in their four meetings. Given their respective levels of play, that’s not going to change in this semifinal. That’s not to say that Serena Williams is unbeatable, or that Radwanska won’t test her patience with defense and guile. But given their respective paths to the semis, Radwanska can’t have much left in the tank to defend if Serena brings her “A” game.
Williams’ last match was a good test for the World No. 1. Her opponent, Li Na, pushed Serena hard one day after a three-set battle against Dominika Cibulkova. Battling fatigue and a slight injury, Williams fought back from a 2-5 second set deficit to win in straight sets. It was a level of championship tennis we’ve come to expect from Serena that won’t be daunted by guile and defense.
Their last meeting hard court was in Istanbul at the WTA Championships. Radwanska won 3 games. She might win more games than that in this semifinal. But she won’t win a set, and certainly won’t win the match.
Serena Williams in two sets.
Kevin Ware is in Miami covering the Sony Open as media for Tennis Panorama News. Follow his live updates on twitter @TennisNewsTPN. Follow his personal twitter @SFTennisFreak.
By Kevin Ware
(March 27, 2013) MIAMI – Maria Sharapova overcame a late second-set charge to defeat Sara Errani 7-5, 7-5 in their quarterfinal match at the Sony Open on Wednesday. The match, an error-filled affair for both, lasted just under two and a half hours.
Sharapova is often quoted saying “A win is a win”, but there are few other positives besides the win that she can take from this match. She hit 44 winners against a whopping 57 unforced errors. To be fair, it wasn’t the cleanest match for Sara either, who hit a far less daunting 13 winners against 25 unforced errors.
Put into context, Sharapova’s unforced error count for two sets was slightly less than the 61 unforced errors committed by Novak Djokovic in his four-set win over Andy Murray at the Australian Open. Additionally, she served 6 aces against 14 double faults. To say that it was not her best day would be an understatement.
“Some days you can’t go out on the court and everything goes in and you feel great, and you’re playing the way you imagined to play. It just doesn’t happen.”
With a title run in Indian Wells, Sharapova had looked to continue her winning ways in Miami for the rare IW-Miami combination. She’d lost just 12 games in her previous 3 matches, and looked to be in top form. But there were early signs that this wouldn’t be her best match.
Though she won the first 3 games for a 3-0 lead, Sharapova had already hit 8 winners, committed 10 unforced errors, and served 3 double faults. Things didn’t get worse, but they certainly didn’t get better as she continued to struggle with her serve and wayward forehand. She was broken at love when serving for the set at 5-4, but got the break for 6-5. She held to take the first set.
Sharapova readily acknowledged her inconsistent level of play. “I put a few points together pretty well, and then, you know, either my concentration or my focus wasn’t there.”
The second set offered more of the same, with a slightly higher quality of tennis. The best moments of drama came at 4-5 when Sharapova fought off three break/set points before finally converting her third game point to even the second set at 5 games apiece. Sharapova won the final three games of the match, ending it in the same manner as she began.
Errani did her best to keep Sharapova off-balance with strong forehands up the line followed by hard crosscourt shots, but it wasn’t enough. “With her (Sharapova) the points are always very fast and very short. I like another style of game, but it’s very difficult to make that because she is very strong.”
Even after this third loss to Sharapova, Errani was happy with her first quarterfinal appearance in Miami before heading into her preferred clay court season. When asked why Sharapova seems to have so much trouble with her game, Errani jokingly responded, “I don’t know. If I know it I can do more to win.”
Sharapova next faces Jelena Jankovic, a 6-4, 7-6,(6) 6-3 winner over Errani’s doubles partner, Roberta Vinci.
Kevin Ware is in Miami covering the Sony Open as media for Tennis Panorama News. Follow his live updates on twitter @TennisNewsTPN. Follow his personal twitter @SFTennisFreak.
Interested in advertising on this site? Please send an email to TennisPanorama@gmail.com of fill out a contact form.
Copyright © 2013 · Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in